Color: [0, 132, 168, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: left Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 9 Font Family: Lucida Sans Unicode Font Style: normal Font Weight: normal Font Decoration: none
Color: [255, 0, 0, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: left Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 9 Font Family: Lucida Sans Unicode Font Style: normal Font Weight: normal Font Decoration: none
Color: [196, 120, 0, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: left Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 9 Font Family: Lucida Sans Unicode Font Style: normal Font Weight: normal Font Decoration: none
Color: [0, 77, 168, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: left Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 10 Font Family: Arial Font Style: normal Font Weight: normal Font Decoration: none
Color: [38, 115, 0, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: left Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 9 Font Family: Arial Font Style: normal Font Weight: normal Font Decoration: none
Color: [168, 112, 0, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: left Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 9 Font Family: Arial Font Style: normal Font Weight: normal Font Decoration: none
Color: [115, 223, 255, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: center Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 9 Font Family: Arial Font Style: normal Font Weight: normal Font Decoration: none
Color: [23, 135, 0, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: left Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 9 Font Family: Arial Font Style: normal Font Weight: normal Font Decoration: none
Description: Planning applications for major developments representing the districts potential housing delivery for the next five years. Details the total number of properties on site and how many are delivered each financial year.
Label Placement: esriServerPolygonPlacementAlwaysHorizontal Label Expression: [Parish] CONCAT NEWLINE CONCAT "Identified Need = " CONCAT [Need] Use Coded Values: true Symbol:
Color: [0, 0, 0, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: baseline Horizontal Alignment: left Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 8 Font Family: Arial Font Style: normal Font Weight: normal Font Decoration: none
Color: [0, 0, 0, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: baseline Horizontal Alignment: left Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 8 Font Family: Arial Font Style: normal Font Weight: normal Font Decoration: none
Color: [196, 120, 0, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: left Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 9 Font Family: Lucida Sans Unicode Font Style: normal Font Weight: normal Font Decoration: none
Unique Value Renderer: Field 1: PRIM_USECLASS Field 2: SEC_USECLASS Field 3: USECLASS Field Delimiter: , Default Symbol:
N/A
Default Label: null UniqueValueInfos:
Value: ,,A1 Label: A1 - Shops; Convenience and Service Uses, , ; , , Convenience and Service Uses; , Convenience and Service Uses, Description: Symbol:
Value: ,A1, Label: A1 - Shops; Convenience and Service Uses, , ; , , Convenience and Service Uses; , Convenience and Service Uses, Description: Symbol:
Value: A1,, Label: A1 - Shops; Convenience and Service Uses, , ; , , Convenience and Service Uses; , Convenience and Service Uses, Description: Symbol:
Value: A1, , Label: A1 - Shops; Convenience and Service Uses, , ; , , Convenience and Service Uses; , Convenience and Service Uses, Description: Symbol:
Value: , ,A1 Label: A1 - Shops; Convenience and Service Uses, , ; , , Convenience and Service Uses; , Convenience and Service Uses, Description: Symbol:
Value: ,A1, Label: A1 - Shops; Convenience and Service Uses, , ; , , Convenience and Service Uses; , Convenience and Service Uses, Description: Symbol:
PLOT_STATUS
(
type: esriFieldTypeString
, alias: Plot Status
, length: 150
, Coded Values:
[Vacant: Previously developed land which is now vacant]
, [Vacant Buildings: Vacant Buildings]
, [Derelict: Derelict Land and Buildings]
, ...3 more...
)
Color: [255, 0, 0, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: left Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 9 Font Family: Lucida Sans Unicode Font Style: normal Font Weight: normal Font Decoration: none
Color: [0, 132, 168, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: left Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 9 Font Family: Lucida Sans Unicode Font Style: normal Font Weight: normal Font Decoration: none
Description: Locations of Listed Buildings across Hambleton that were built pre 1720. Specifically monitored by the Society for the Protection of Ancient Buildings(SPAB).
Description: Points locating Non Designated Heritage Assets (NDHA) that have been assessed during the Planning Application process and registered as a NDHA.
Description: The Heritage at Risk (HAR) register identifies those designated sites that are under threat as a result of neglect, decay or inappropriate development. This dataset contains: · Listed Buildings at risk · Places of Worship at risk · Scheduled Monuments (archaeology or building/structure) at risk · Registered Battlefields at risk · Registered Parks and Gardens at risk · Protected Wreck Sites at risk · Conservation Areas at risk For more information about Heritage at Risk, please visit: https://historicengland.org.uk/advice/heritage-at-risk/
Color: [205, 137, 102, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: left Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 9 Font Family: Arial Font Style: normal Font Weight: normal Font Decoration: none
Color: [230, 0, 0, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: left Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 9 Font Family: Arial Font Style: normal Font Weight: normal Font Decoration: none
Color: [115, 115, 0, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: left Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 9 Font Family: Arial Font Style: normal Font Weight: normal Font Decoration: none
Color: [169, 0, 230, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: left Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 9 Font Family: Arial Font Style: normal Font Weight: normal Font Decoration: none
Color: [115, 223, 255, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: center Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 9 Font Family: Arial Font Style: normal Font Weight: normal Font Decoration: none
Description: The Agricultural Land Classification (ALC) provides a method for assessing the quality of farmland to enable informed choices to be made about its future use within the planning system. The ALC system classifies land into five grades. The best and most versatile land is defined as Grades 1, 2 and 3a by policy guidance. This is the land which is most flexible, productive and efficient in response to inputs and which can best deliver future crops for food and non food uses such as biomass, fibres and pharmaceuticals. Current estimates are that Grades 1 and 2 together form about 21% of all farmland in England; Subgrade 3a also covers about 21%. After the introduction of the ALC system in 1966 the whole of England and Wales was mapped from reconnaissance field surveys, to provide general strategic guidance on land quality for planners. Since 1976, selected areas have been resurveyed in greater detail and to revised guidelines and criteria. Information based on detailed ALC field surveys in accordance with current guidelines (MAFF, 1988) is the most definitive source.
Description: The Agricultural Land Classification (ALC) provides a method for assessing the quality of farmland to enable informed choices to be made about its future use within the planning system. The ALC system classifies land into five grades. The best and most versatile land is defined as Grades 1, 2 and 3a by policy guidance. This is the land which is most flexible, productive and efficient in response to inputs and which can best deliver future crops for food and non food uses such as biomass, fibres and pharmaceuticals. Current estimates are that Grades 1 and 2 together form about 21% of all farmland in England; Subgrade 3a also covers about 21%. After the introduction of the ALC system in 1966 the whole of England and Wales was mapped from reconnaissance field surveys, to provide general strategic guidance on land quality for planners. Since 1976, selected areas have been resurveyed in greater detail and to revised guidelines and criteria. Information based on detailed ALC field surveys in accordance with current guidelines (MAFF, 1988) is the most definitive source.
Color: [0, 135, 99, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: left Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 9 Font Family: Lucida Sans Unicode Font Style: normal Font Weight: normal Font Decoration: none
Description: Polygons depicting Character Areas across both districts. Each of which is distinctive with a unique 'sense of place'. These broad divisions of landscape form the basic units of cohesive countryside character, on which strategies for both ecological and landscape issues can be based.
Description: "An esker is a long, winding ridge of stratified sand and gravel, examples of which occur in glaciated and formerly glaciated regions of Europe and North America. Eskers are frequently several kilometres long and, because of their peculiar uniform shape, are somewhat like railway embankments." SITE NOTIFICATION At the June 2015 meeting of the NYLGSP, it was agreed that the following terms would be used to describe sites: Candidate - sites identified, mainly from the geological literature, as possible Local Geological Sites Approved - sites approved by the NYLGS Panel Notified - sites notified to the relevant local authority Desugnated - sites included in the relevant local plan. Candidate sites have been further subdivided into: Candidate 1 sites – those suitable for approval and notification Candidate 2 sites – those with an issue (e.g. active quarry, access, need for further research or site visit) restricting approval and notification Candidate 3 Geomorphology sites – large scale geomorphological sites with multiple ownership issues. During a discussion at the November, 2015 NYLGSP meeting it was felt that the Candidate 3 Geomorphology sites could also be included in local authority landscape proposals.
Description: "A moraine is any glacially formed accumulation of unconsolidated glacial debris (regolith and rock) that occurs in both currently and formerly glaciated region, through geomorphological processes. Moraines are formed from debris previously carried along by a glacier and normally consist of somewhat rounded particles ranging in size from large boulders to minute glacial flour. Lateral moraines are formed at the side of the ice flow and terminal moraines at the foot, marking the maximum advance of the glacier. Other types of moraine include ground moraines, till-covered areas with irregular topography, and medial moraines which are formed where two glaciers meet." SITE NOTIFICATION At the June 2015 meeting of the NYLGSP, it was agreed that the following terms would be used to describe sites: Candidate - sites identified, mainly from the geological literature, as possible Local Geological Sites Approved - sites approved by the NYLGS Panel Notified - sites notified to the relevant local authority Desugnated - sites included in the relevant local plan. Candidate sites have been further subdivided into: Candidate 1 sites – those suitable for approval and notification Candidate 2 sites – those with an issue (e.g. active quarry, access, need for further research or site visit) restricting approval and notification Candidate 3 Geomorphology sites – large scale geomorphological sites with multiple ownership issues. During a discussion at the November, 2015 NYLGSP meeting it was felt that the Candidate 3 Geomorphology sites could also be included in local authority landscape proposals.
Color: [28, 140, 0, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: left Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 9 Font Family: Arial Font Style: normal Font Weight: normal Font Decoration: none
Color: [38, 115, 0, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: left Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 9 Font Family: Arial Font Style: normal Font Weight: normal Font Decoration: none
Description: The Impact Risk Zones (IRZs) are a GIS tool used by Natural England to make an initial assessment of the potential impacts of development proposals on Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs). They define zones around each SSSI according to the particular sensitivities of the features for which it is notified and specify the types of development that have the potential to have adverse impacts.
Description: Contains all sites submitted as Alternative sites and inlcudes Tranche 3 and 4 of Local Green Space Sites. Sites named with a post fix of a/b/c where multiple part of sites. Inlcudes notification of preferred options of development sites and the draft preferred options for LGS.
Description: The functional floodplain describes those areas of floodplain that are closest to the river and flood frequently. It is generally accepted as representing the portion of land where water has to flow or be stored in times of flood. Functional Floodplain is defined ona local basis. If an area is intended to flood, then this should be safeguarded from development and identified as functinal floodplain, even though it might not flood very often.
Description: Land where water would flow or be stored in times of flooding if constraints due to developemnt or infrastructure did not already exist.i.e. areas that should be functional floodplain if not already developed. Should any potential developemnt sites in Zone 3ai become available for new or further development then both the risk at the site and their influence on flood risk in the surrounding area should be carefully considered.